JFK Reflections

John_F_Kennedy_Official_Portrait

Friday November 22, 2013 marks the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  As we reflect on that tragic day and honor the memory of the late president, students in the “Oral History” class this semester conducted a series of interviews with current and retired Samford employees and alumni.  Each  day this week, the Bull Pup will highlight these Samford voices.JFK Collage Friday (3)L to R: (Top Row) Governor Albert Brewer, Professor of Law and Government; William Mike Howell, Professor of Biology; William Nunnelley, Senior Editor and Director of Public Relations at Samford; Marlene Rikard, Professor of History; Wilton H. Bunch, Professor of Philosophy; (Middle Row) Jennings Marshall, Professor of Economics; Larry Davenport, Professor of Biology; (Bottom Row) Ellen McLaughlin, Professor of Biology; H. Hugh Floyd, Professor of Sociology; Joe McDade, class of 1961;  Elizabeth Wells, Special Collection Archivist 

Which was more impactful for you: the JFK Assassination, the Nixon resignation, or 9/11?

McLaughlin: Coming from NY and knowing some people who worked in those buildings – [they] were not killed, but they did go across the Brooklyn Bridge to get home – I would say that had more of an impact than either Nixon or Kennedy, because in both of those, there was a resolution— there was a transition that our government had provided for, our system of government.  9-11 there’s still not… there’s still too much emotion all wrapped up in that.  There’s no resolution yet for these people.

Nunnelley: I thought that the Kennedy assassination probably was more impactful because it was so shocking.  It may be simply because I was up there marching in that funeral procession after Kennedy was shot and seeing those hundreds of thousands of people lining the streets.  We marched from the Capital, down to the White House and then over to the church where the funeral procession was held. And then we marched from there past the Lincoln Memorial and across Arlington Bridge to Arlington Cemetery.  We didn’t go into the cemetery, but . . . right outside and we could hear the funeral being conducted.  The guy that blew “Taps” made a mistake on one of his notes which was an unfortunate thing.  Air Force One flew over and all the dignitaries were there.

Rikard: They’re all different. The assassination was of someone that I admired and had policies that I identified with. Nixon I did not like from the very beginning. I used to almost yell at the T.V. when he came on and was lying to us and you knew he was lying. So I was glad when he resigned. I was upset that he was still going to get a pension, but I was glad that he resigned and that we were through with him. 9/11, I was at a different age and it was a different world. It was a world where we had suddenly become aware of terrorism. They’re different events and I don’t know how you compare them. It’s apples and oranges.

Marshall: Definitely 9/11. I mean, if you look at it, we’ve had a number of presidents killed in the past. This was a terrible thing, but it was something that had happened before. The tragedy of Kennedy being killed was over with Oswald being killed by Ruby. With 9/11, with the terrorists killing all those people, and it wasn’t over. You knew that was just the beginning. A terrible beginning.

Brewer: They are all so different.  They all represent failure.  In terms of tragedy — the magnitude of tragedy [of] 9/11 would have been probably greater.  In terms of failure of the system of government in which we take such pride and for which so many have died . . . it just failed.  The person [Nixon] we selected to lead proved unworthy of the trust that was placed in him.  That is sad, a personal failure like that is sad.   The Kennedy assassination just represents an act of violence for what reason we don’t know.  When a flower is just taken from among us — we were deprived of the results of his vision.  He had a vision, a great vision.  Every leader has a dream of the way he wants to go; some are stronger than others.  Few would have been as strong as John Kennedy was with his and his sincerity of purpose.  Our nation, his generation, and the generations to come were deprived of the realization of that dream.

Mayfield: Oh I felt the most impact from the war in Vietnam.  That’s the big if — if Kennedy had lived would we have gotten stuck in Vietnam? I really think that Vietnam, it took ten years, and had more of an impact. There’s catastrophe, then there’s ongoing catastrophe. We can often bind our wounds after catastrophe, but to see people sent off to die, over and over again, in my opinion was just devastating.

McDade: Each one is different, each one has their own unique connection with history and that was a loss of a president.  We had lost presidents before, some died in office and that was a tragic thing.  But I think when terrorists attack you in your own country it is a different experience, so they are unique in their own experience.

Bunch: I followed the Nixon resignation much more closely, the most closely of those three.  I think because I am older and more thoughtful, probably 9/11 had a bigger effect on me because I could imagine outcomes that could be disasters.  I was fascinated by Nixon, but I don’t think I worried that the nation was ever going to fall.  Whereas 9/11, I could easily imagine World War III, and so I think that probably had the biggest effect.

Dvonch: Oh, personally?  Nixon.  I was in Washington D.C. going to college during Watergate and I was taking a class taught by a congressional aid on politics in the election.  and so I volunteered at the White House and I volunteered for Spiro Agnew, opening his mail.  And I wrote Christmas cards for congressmen. So I was very involved and it just totally mesmerized me and also disappointed me. Because of my personal experience being in Washington at that time, I felt like I was experiencing that history, as opposed to just observing 9/11 or the Kennedy assassination. I had met Spiro Agnew, I had been in the Nixon White House.  It was more real.

Wells: I was angry at Nixon. I was angry because he didn’t have to do that to win. He had been so good with China.  Yet when 9/11 happened, I couldn’t believe. I couldn’t understand it. It was so loud. I thought, ‘what is happening?’ I saw it, then I saw the second one hit and realized this is real.  It was just incredulous. I had to teach a class in here that afternoon on the Civil War. Can you imagine what that was like to teach a class on the Civil War on 9/11?

Floyd: 9/11. . . 9/11 was a global issue.  It disturbed me more.  Not necessarily because the towers were attacked and the pentagon was attacked.  Globalization . . . means we are right in the middle of it.  9/11 was so powerful and [it was] symbolic to attack the trade center which was the center of global capitalism and to attack the Pentagon which was the center of global militarism because we are the big guys.

Davenport: Well, this will be unpopular, but I would say the Kennedy assassination, because I was at such an impressionable age.  After that, it was just like the innocence was all gone. The Nixon resignation, we applauded that, we knew it was coming.  That was not a shock.  Now, 9/11, I’m still trying to make sense of it.  But, the first loss of innocence was Kennedy.

Howell: 9/11.  That was the first time we had really been attacked here by a foreign nation.  And so many people got killed. I remember exactly where I was when that happened too. We all thought it was a small plane to begin with, but when we found out it was a jumbo jet, it was crazy.  I was watching the TV when the other plane came in and I KNEW it wasn’t an accident.  We watched the buildings crumble, fall to the earth.  We saw people standing up there and jumping.  I think that had more of an effect on me.  I mean, those people went to work that morning and they had wives and husbands and kids and they never came home. But my daily life didn’t really change after [the Kennedy assassination and Watergate].  Everyone’s lives were changed immediately.  We went straight to war, then we went into Iraq, and the war is still going on. The economy tanked. We are still reeling from that one event.  It rocked the world.

Adapted from Oral History Interviews by Holly Howell, Sara Curley, Ben Woodall, Haley Rester, Smith Ann Burley, Katie Dover, Lauren Ziemer and Robert McNeill.

Advertisements

Lee Harvey Oswald

Lee_Harvey_Oswald_arrest_card_1963 (2)

Friday November 22, 2013 marks the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  As we reflect on that tragic day and honor the memory of the late president, students in the “Oral History” class this semester conducted a series of interviews with current and retired Samford employees and alumni.  Each  day this week, the Bull Pup will highlight these Samford voices.

JFK Thursday

L to R: (Top Row) John Mayfield, Professor of History; Lowell Vann, Professor of Art; Marlene Rikard, Professor of HistoryLarry Davenport, Professor of Biology; (Middle Row)  Judge John Carroll, Dean of Cumberland School of Law; Jennings Marshall, Professor of Economics; James Brown, Professor of History; (Bottom Row) William Collins, Professor of Political Science; Harold Hunt, Retired Samford Theatre Department ChairWilliam Mike Howell, Professor of Biology; Governor Albert Brewer, Professor of Law and Government; Brad Bishop, Professor of Law

What were your reactions to the arrest/murder of Lee Harvey Oswald? Was he the lone gunman? Why was Kennedy assassinated?

Bishop: I remember that he [Oswald] was arrested.  I remember seeing on television a live shot of him being shot and killed unexpectedly by a person who had not been mentioned up until that time.  I think the thing that went through everyone’s minds was — set up; that it was a designed plan, but no one ever really knew what happened.  History doesn’t really support that, but I think that everybody at the time when it happened was even more afraid then because there seemed to be a cover up to make it difficult to figure out exactly what happened.

Brewer: You may recall a man named Jack Garrison, who was the DA in New Orleans who alleged the conspiracy and got an indictment maybe, but nothing came of it, so I am not sure that there is any evidence or significant evidence that anyone was implicated other than Oswald.  I have no idea and I never let myself get caught up in the investigations or the allegations of the Communist plot.  I never felt that there was enough information to reach a definite conclusion one way or the other.  Oswald was undoubtedly an unbalanced person.

Carroll:  It was absolute shock that here I am watching television and watching the perpetrator that killed President Kennedy and then all of the sudden there was another assassination.  It is hard to describe how unsettling all this was.  Here is a country . . . built on the rule of law — that there was a political process — and all of the sudden these two prominent murders and then of course five years later Bobby Kennedy was assassinated, and Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated.

Brown: It was so quick, just three days later, you couldn’t help but think conspiracy.  The fact that Oswald had the Cuban and Russian connections . . . . You really didn’t want to know if it had been a Russian plot because that would have meant war.

Collins: It was a hit. The guy came up and did what a professional hitperson would do. So he came up . . . and didn’t even have to aim the gun. Ruby was a mobster.

Rester: The [Warren Commission] findings just weren’t solid enough for me. While I didn’t think it was a conspiracy, I left room for it to be. But over the years, as I read more and thought more, I pretty well ruled it out. It was a lone, individual working to do the unthinkable.

One of the things that puzzled me though is how Oswald was able to make that shot from that distance. And at a moving target and hit several people in that car. That was a little problematic — especially with people saying they heard shots coming from other directions.

Rikard: I’ve never been much of a conspiracy advocate, I think often individual people do terrible things on their own and I’ve never seen anything that convinced me that there was a conspiracy.

Marshall: How does this Night Club guy who’s just this shadowy character, how does he get past all these FBI and police and everybody and . . . walk up to Oswald and shoot him? It was just beyond belief.  That made people think Oswald knew something that somebody didn’t want him to be able to tell. So everybody’s thinking, Who’s behind it? Was the mob behind it? Was Cuba behind it? Was Lyndon Johnson behind it? Does it have something to do with Marilyn Monroe? All this wild speculation.

But it was just strange to see somebody shot live on television. Now there’s all these reality shows, but this was real. There he was, just Bam. Shot right there and killed right there on T.V.

I got to go home on Sunday for Church leave [from military school]. You got to go home on Sunday to go to church. So my dad came out and picked me up and my roommate came with me. We went to church then we went to my parent’s house and my mother was fixing Sunday dinner, and we were sitting around the T.V. watching the coverage [of] the assassination. It was the only thing on T.V. They had all this coverage about Lee Harvey Oswald, and you see him being transferred from the jail to somewhere, and you see this guy walk around this policeman and walk towards Oswald, and you hear the shot.  My roommate said, “He just shot him!” And I said, “Naw, he didn’t, did he?” And my dad said, “I think he did!” I said, “What?!” We’re all watching it, but you still didn’t believe it.

Mayfield: On Sunday we hauled off to church which wasn’t very cheery either, and we were coming back in this big white Pontiac, and Walter Cronkite with CBS News came on the radio, and said that Lee Harvey Oswald had been shot. Where does this end? First, you have the President shot, then you have the prime suspect shot. I went home and turned on the TV and saw the replay of it, of Oswald’s shooting, and I couldn’t believe it. They took this guy [Oswald] out of the car across from a parking garage with nobody in front of him, and a crowd milling about, and even at the ripe old age of eighteen I realized that was in technical terms, stupid.

Hunt: The fact that Ruby was so irritated with him [Oswald] and felt that close to the Kennedys and wanted to do that for the Kennedys. It was an amazing time.  I know Johnson really wanted to be president; he would have liked to be president when Kennedy went in, but I can’t believe that Johnson would be implicated; I just don’t think so.

Davenport: It was an amazing shot, that’s the part that gets me.  Oswald was depicted as this Communist trouble maker.  I remember, and, of course, this was a time of constant [fear of] Communism and conspiracy theories.  We were all, as kids, junior G-men, looking for Commies under every rock and, so, we didn’t have any doubt that Oswald did it.  We didn’t have any doubt that he was connected to the U.S.S.R. and the only downside of Jack Ruby killing him is that we would never know the connection.

Howell: And for him to be shot by the owner of a nightclub and a sleazy type guy? You say, “Now who paid HIM to kill Oswald?”  I always felt that he was a hit man for somebody.  I was watching the very moment when they brought him out and Jack Ruby shot and killed him.  Another traumatic event.  Whatever Oswald knew was gone forever.

Floyd: The guy that killed him was portrayed as having some collusionary connections with other elements that wanted Kennedy dead.  That made the conspiracy theory much more viable for sure.

At the time, I thought it was very interesting because the media portrayed him as kind of conspiratorially related to Kennedy’s hostility towards communism and capital links of the US.  Whether it was the Cosa Nostra kinds of relations or in Cuba.  I didn’t think there was an argument convincing enough for me to take a position.

Vann: I think if he [Oswald] had been kept alive and been put on trial maybe those things would have come out, but it just sort of closed the door and you didn’t know what was on the other side of that door.

 

Adapted from Oral History Interviews by Holly Howell, Sara Curley, Ben Woodall, Haley Rester, Smith Ann Burley, Katie Dover, Lauren Ziemer and Robert McNeill.

JFK Assassination Reaction

Friday November 22, 2013 marks the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  As we reflect on that tragic day and honor the memory of the late president, students in the “Oral History” class this semester conducted a series of interviews with current and retired Samford employees and alumni.  Each  day this week, the Bull Pup will highlight these Samford voices.

JFK Collage 3

L to R: (Top Row) Elizabeth Wells, Special Collection Archivist; William Nunnelley, Senior Editor and Director of Public Relations at SamfordJames Brown, Professor of History; Brad Bishop, Professor of Law; William Collins, Professor of Political Science; (Middle Row) Marlene Rikard, Professor of History; Harold Hunt, Retired Samford Theatre Department Chair; Larry Davenport, Professor of Biology; (Bottom Row) Jennings Marshall, Professor of Economics; John Mayfield, Professor of History; Ellen McLaughlin, Professor of Biology; Governor Albert Brewer, Professor of Law and Government  

How did the news impact you? How did your world change (or did it)?

McLaughlin: It was an emotional time. I don’t think we thought the world was gonna end, and we were grateful for a country where you could have a peaceful transition.

Wells: The assassination was one thing but our world was topsy turvey in ways that we never had before.  In 1963, our whole life changed. It was never going to be the same. That one year: the president is assassinated, dogs and hoses in downtown. . . The reporters that [my dad] worked with were afraid. Seeing what happened, it was like, ‘I can’t believe this. This is really happening. It really happened.’ It was incredulous that this could happen to a president. I don’t know why we thought it couldn’t, but we had never had that before. Of course, there were assassinations that happened before, but I mean, good gravy! You never think about that.

Mayfield: Oh yeah. That was a pivotal moment, it was one of the worst days, the worst weeks of my life, it was just awful . . . I remember that very well.

Bishop:  I coached the debate team and . . . they were young liberal Democrats that liked Kennedy, much more so than the more conservative students on campus.  It was heartbreaking for them and I think it ultimately . . . changed some of their lives.  It was unexpected and there weren’t any real answers at the time and there still aren’t.  It is still a mystery.

Hunt:  We had television . . . and we just literally camped out for days it seemed like. The television was on 24 hours a day . . . but you just didn’t want to miss a minute of it, and you just got caught up in the history of it and the significance of it. And the pictures, I can still remember so much of those pictures on television . . . . It was sort of a lost weekend . . . .

Brown: I can not tell you I was politically conscious when I was 18, but JFK had brought a kind of air of youth and vigor . . . that eased us young folks into politics . . . . I changed my major a little over 7 months later from engineering to history and poli-sci because they weren’t talking about any of this stuff in engineering, they weren’t talking about what was going on in domestic affairs, they weren’t talking about what was going on in foreign affairs.  I suspect that was the single most important event that pushed me over the edge into humanities was Kennedy’s assassination.

Collins: Before the assassination, in my twenties, I was pretty much a believer that the United States was a great place in terms of what it had to offer to the rest of the world. But the experience of that assassination, the experience of Bob Kennedy being assassinated, and in particular Martin Luther King being assassinated, plus my experience with the Vietnam War suggested to me that America is not what it appears to be and that’s sort of been my opinion from that point on. I don’t go around announcing that, but it unhinged everything.  The initial reaction in my class was that this was the beginning of some kind of atomic attack. Then we went to the coffee shop and sat with friends and just didn’t say anything. It was kind of like Pearl Harbor, just a trauma.

Rikard: Your first political hero was gone, and . . . there’s Johnson who was a totally different personality thrown into a difficult situation. And at the same time you lived in Birmingham where all these other events were taking place as part of the civil rights movement. And I had seen a lot of the sit-ins and so forth because I was working downtown and I walked during my lunch hour. I didn’t see the demonstrations over at Kelly Ingram, but I saw some of the sit-ins and demonstrations downtown.  Even though I know now that JFK was drawn reluctantly into the civil rights issues, still he embodied a view that was different from what the gubernatorial administration in Alabama was displaying, and I was drawn to that. My political world changed not only because of the assassination of JFK, but also because everything was moving so fast on the civil rights movement. And it all became melded together. . . and Johnson drew upon the feelings of the country and wanted to do something in the memory of JFK.  What stands out vividly in my mind is the reaction of one of my coworkers. She was so crass! Because the administrators at the WMU[1] told us they were going to close the building down, go home. And this woman came up to me and said, “Well this is one way to get a holiday.”  I couldn’t believe that somebody could be that crass about the tragedy that had just occurred.  I don’t know why that has stuck with me. I guess just because it had been like somebody had stabbed you — that somebody would say something like that in the face of such a tragedy.

How did the news impact those around you (friends, family, etc)?

Davenport: My world didn’t change.  I did feel a tremendous loss, something unthinkable had happened, in broad daylight, to someone who had become a hero for that generation.  He was becoming a hero of mine.  Everything about him was positive.  Of course, we had that whole early 1960s happiness about us.  I think that whole generation was happy to be free of World War II and the Korean War. Of course, the Vietnam War was about to hit, but they were happy times and they were prosperous times, and our president was leading us through that.

Nunnelley: Well we were just sort of shocked . . . stunned.  You don’t think that that will happen.  Presidents had been shot, obviously . . . but it had been a long time since there had been any sort of violence like that related to the President. So it was just a very shocking moment.  I remember that day very well, even though it’s been almost fifty years.  I was a young coast guard recruit in boot camp at Cape May, New Jersey, which is not that far from Washington maybe a hundred and fifty miles or so.  They wanted to have representatives of all the branches of service to march in the funeral procession in Washington. . .We didn’t have much access to news, but the next morning we understood that they were going to take a group of us down to Washington.  And so the next morning they put us on buses and took us — this would be on Saturday, the next day, to the Baltimore Coast Guard station.  And we stayed there.  On Sunday they bused us over to Washington, and split us up into small groups.  So when we were on the bus going to that assignment, or maybe it was when we were going back up to Baltimore for the night, we heard somebody in the front of the bus say, “They’ve shot another one.”  Well that was when Jack Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald in the Dallas Police Station on Sunday afternoon.  And so Monday, we put on our dress blues and we all went and we lined up on the North side of the Capital for the funeral procession.

Brewer: There were so many heart-wrenching things that took place and there was such a pall of grieving just everywhere.  You not only had the unbelievable picture of the assassination of an attractive and popular young president, but you had the terrible grief on his young beautiful family, who in many ways were just an all-American family and then you had the uncertainty of who would do such a dastardly thing; is our country under siege?  How serious is this?  What does it mean?  What could we do?  And who would do such a thing?  You began wondering what steps will be taken in determining who was responsible.  It was a busy, hectic, bewildering time.  And it was strange that we had such strong impressions and recollections about it many, many years later.

Marshall: We had the special ceremony, and they actually covered it with the local T.V. station, our special parade with the flag.  My roommate, who was an outstanding trumpeter, played “Taps.” And everybody was very emotional. Everybody was shocked. It was just disbelief. It was kind of surreal. Everybody just sort of stood around.  It was just a disbelief, a shocking thing.  There was a lot of tension in those days, and there was speculation about Cuba and tension with Cuba and people wondered, will this end up causing a war with Cuba? Who did this? Why?

Dvonch: There were religious teachers and non-religious teachers in the Catholic school, the idea that this happened to him because he was a Catholic, that was the initial reaction — why else would they kill him?  There was that thought that somehow people killed Catholics.


[1] Women’s Missionary Union

Adapted from Oral History Interviews by Holly Howell, Sara Curley, Ben Woodall, Haley Rester, Smith Ann Burley, Katie Dover, Lauren Ziemer and Robert McNeill.

JFK Assassination

jfk tuesday pic

Friday November 22, 2013 marks the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  As we reflect on that tragic day and honor the memory of the late president, students in the “Oral History” class this semester conducted a series of interviews with current and retired Samford employees and alumni.  Each  day this week, the Bull Pup will highlight these Samford voices.

JFK Collage 2

L to R: (Top Row) William Collins, Professor of Political Science; Elizabeth Wells, Special Collection Archivist; Governor Albert Brewer, Professor of Law and Government; Wilton H. Bunch, Professor of Philosophy; (Bottom Row) John Mayfield, Professor of History; Judge John Carroll, Dean of Cumberland School of Law; Jennings Marshall, Professor of Economics; James Brown, Professor of History

Where were you and what were you doing when you heard the news of his assassination?

Wells: I was a freshman at Banks high school. I was in my English class. We were having a vocabulary exam that day.  Everything was just like normal when all of the sudden over the intercom comes this newscast and our principal said ‘You need to listen to this.’  There was the broadcast of the national news talking about the assassination of the president.  We all just sat there.  My teacher cried. It was stunning to think that the president of the United States had been assassinated.

Marshall: I was in military school. I went to the barracks, because I had a free period, and I turned on the radio, which I wasn’t supposed to do.  When I heard the news I was shocked.  I walked out of the barracks and I went down to the Quonset hut where the ROTC unit was.  The professor of military science there was Captain Lindsey. I said to Captain Lindsey, “Did you hear what happened?” He said, “No, what happened?” I said, “The President’s been shot!” And he immediately said, “No! What?” I said, “Yeah! It was just on the radio! The President’s been shot!” There weren’t any radios in there, so he jumped up from his chair and ran outside to turn on the radio in his car.  I followed him, and he was in his car listening to the radio, and I was standing next to his car.

Carroll: You know it probably hit us worse than other parts of the country because we were in Massachusetts and it was a shock; absolute disbelief because my generation saw Kennedy as the . . . torch bearer for a new America.  It was just a terrible shock and a terrible tragedy.

Rester: I was attending Perkinston Junior College in Mississippi. I left school early that day and got a ride down to Gulf Port, which is twelve miles from home [Biloxi, Mississippi]. There was a bus that went back and forth between Gulf Port and Biloxi. As I got on the bus, there were two ladies talking about somebody that had been shot in a convertible. I wasn’t interested in that conversation very much; I thought “Gosh, that’s unfortunate.” When I got home, probably about 20 minutes later, my sister Sherri was visiting, and she met me on the steps of our home and she said that someone had shot the president. We went inside, and Walter Cronkite, I think, was on the air live, and at that time I don’t think they knew the outcome. I did get to see the part where he announced that the President was dead.

Bunch: I was then a graduate student in physiology and bio-physics and a resident in orthopedic surgery at the University of Minnesota.  The night before Kennedy was shot…the Twin City Orthopedic Society had a guest speaker and, totally out of custom, they invited the residents.  I was at this fancy dinner with a guest speaker from Virginia, and to warm up the crowd he was telling jokes.  And his last joke was that “Arkansas had devised a plan to eliminate all the taxes.  You might wonder how they’re going to do this. Pretty simple.  They were going to shoot Bobby Kennedy and put a pay toilet over his grave.”  And we laughed…The next morning, well I guess it was about a little after noon.  I was walking up the steps of the library and somebody came dashing out and said, “The President has just been shot and is probably dead!”  I had that sudden feeling of irresponsibility.  Just last night it was funny that somebody might shoot one of the Kennedys, and today, someone did.  It was just as if I had been slugged and I have never really forgotten that moment.  I was just, sort of in a daze; I took it so personally.  That evening of laughing, I just felt guilty as sin.

Mayfield: It came over the loud speaker, and we were in the middle of physics class, and I guess it ran from 11:30 to 12:30. . .the speaker came on and he [the principal] had an important message that the president had been shot in Dallas and that we wouldn’t have any other kinds of information, so we went from there to homeroom. Everybody was in homeroom, and they asked us to stay and have a moment of prayer for the President, who at that moment was assumed to still be alive.  I could hear the assistant coach on the telephone in the office next to homeroom, and he was saying “Oh, I see, I see, I see, I see,” and the moment of prayer stopped and the loudspeaker came on and said, “Okay, the moment of prayer has stopped,” and as that came on the assistant coach walked out and said, “President Kennedy’s dead.” He had a friend at Parkland Hospital, and when they brought the body in it was pretty clear that he was dead. We knew he was not one to make things up.

Brewer: Someone came into the dining room where we were having lunch.  I think it was the manager of the place who was an acquaintance.  He came over to our table, just my wife, Martha and I, just the two of us, and said the radio has just reported that President Kennedy has been shot in Dallas.  I thought it can’t be and then the next question, how serious was it.   I asked that question and he said they didn’t know.  They hadn’t said anything to that effect and then I remember a businessman from Decatur came through the dining room and made a comment about how happy he was at the news or something to that effect.  About that time the radio reported that he was not expected to live.  It was a few short minutes that it was reported that he had died.

Collins: I was in Tallahassee Florida.  I was finishing my undergraduate degree. I was a senior. I was taking a course in comparative politics under a professor Robert Bone. I can remember the building I was in and I was sitting down in the 3rd row in the left side, that’s how vivid it was. He [Bone] had been a diplomat in Indonesia and we were studying Indonesian politics and they were very fearful at the PKI was going to take over and we were discussing that. I remember the lecture. And then the head of the department came in and said the president had been shot and we were just all kind of stunned. He continued the lecture, I even have the notes for it, somewhere packed away. Then the same guy came in about a half our later and said the president’s dead. We just all thought the war had started.

Brown: I was coming down the library steps, the old main library at Tennessee Tech, it had two flights, a left one and a right one, and I was coming down the left hand flight of steps and about two steps from the top someone at the bottom called up to us what was happening. I can take you to the step today and show you which one.

Dvonch: I was in my seventh grade classroom.  We had televisions in the classroom . . . we could see it right then and there. We saw it unfolding.  It was very striking as a child.

Adapted from Oral History Interviews by Holly Howell, Sara Curley, Ben Woodall, Haley Rester, Smith Ann Burley, Katie Dover, and Robert McNeill.

John F. Kennedy

JFK pic

Friday November 22, 2013 marks the 50th anniversary of the assassination of President John F. Kennedy.  As we reflect on that tragic day and honor the memory of the late president, students in the “Oral History” class this semester conducted a series of interviews with current and retired Samford employees and alumni.  Each  day this week, the Bull Pup will highlight these Samford voices.

JFK Collage Square

L to R: (Top Row) John Mayfield, Professor of History; Elizabeth Wells, Special Collection Archivist; James Brown, Professor of History; Governor Albert Brewer; Harold Hunt, Retired Samford Theatre Department Chair; (Middle Row) Wilton H. Bunch, Professor of Philosophy; William Nunnelley, Senior Editor and Director of Public Relations at Samford; Joe McDade, class of 1961;  (Bottom Row) William Mike Howell, Professor of Biology; Marlene Rikard, Professor of History; William Collins, Professor of Political Science; H. Hugh Floyd, Professor of Sociology

What were your views (or your family’s views) of JFK/Kennedys before his assassination?

Howell: Most of the people where I grew up, in south Alabama, did not like the Kennedys . . . and they did not like the idea of integration; they wanted everything to be separate. There were lots of lies that would go around about the Kennedys and people would make up untrue stories about them to try to make them sound like a worse family than they were.  People said that they were trying to push integration on all of the south and no one wanted any of that.  You could hear this talk going on all the time.

Bunch: I was a rock-rib Republican. I didn’t vote for him. Despite the fact that I was really a Republican and I had Catholic biases . . . I thought that he had done very well.

Dvonch: as a child, . . . my views were that he was young, so much younger than Eisenhower, that he was funny, that people liked him, that he had little kids, . . ., I could relate . . . .  So my view of him was a very positive one. Well, I grew up in a Catholic family, so they were very positive because of his Catholicism.  My mother was Irish, so she was very favorable because of the Irish connection.  I grew up in Chicago.  Chicago was controlled by Irish politicians, and in fact some people claim it was the Irish Chicago political machine that got him elected. So the whole city of Chicago was very much behind him.  We would have his press conferences broadcasted on our channel 9, WGN, and so when we’d come home after school, instead of cartoons we’d see the president.  [Vicki (Dvonch) Bunch grew up in Chicago.  She experienced the JFK assassination as a seventh grade student and followed the event via television.  She graduated from Loyola University/ Stritch School of Medicine in 1976 and proceeded to practice Orthopedic Surgery.  She is married to Wilton Bunch.]

Floyd: I viewed him as a progressive that was a reasonable progressive.  I didn’t have any kind of reservations about his religious affiliations.  My family was the same way. They didn’t feel that it was a threat.  They were pretty progressive. Even though they were evangelical Protestants they were not exclusionists.

Rikard: He was one of my early political heroes.  When I became eligible to vote during his assent into politics and the presidency, I found him to be a very interesting person. He was young. He represented change, he represented a more liberal view of life and of politics. He had a very attractive personality, a very dynamic personality that . . . attracted a lot of young people about my age in the 1960s.

Brewer: He seemed to have an aptitude for governing, for understanding the art of the possible, for implementing programs that were well conceived and broadly beneficial.  I just had a very favorable impression of him.  It was unusual being from the South to have that sense because he was looked on with disfavor by a lot of people in the South who were interested in politics because he was a New Englander but, there was a sense of moderation in him and a reasonableness that left one with feeling that you didn’t have to fear him.  But, there is some people whose views that are seen as so radical that one doesn’t want to subscribe to them.  He was not that way.

Wells: My family was Baptist. There was discussion at that time about JFK being Catholic. Would he be able to make decisions on his own? Or would the church interfere? That was a big question being asked at that time.  I don’t think my parents, that I recall, espoused that at all.  They were more concerned that he, being such a young person, be able to run the country.

Mayfield: My family was very conservative. They didn’t like him. I liked him.  I liked his style. I liked his politics. I liked his sense of humor and his commanding presence.  I was young at the time, and he was a refreshing change from the Eisenhower years. Eisenhower was a good man, but he was kind of dull. Kennedy brought in style.  People like that attract you. But mostly I liked his sense of humor; he was just really good at press conferences, and responding to the give and take.

Hunt: I voted for John Kennedy. I’m not sure why. I’m a Republican. I’ve been a Republican for years and years and years, but there was something about getting caught up in the Kennedy aura.

McDade:  I hate to admit it but I did not vote for him.  I voted for Richard Nixon . . . .  But as he [John F. Kennedy] became president, I became very interested in his administration and was very impressed with . . . what he was doing.  After the Cuban Missile Crisis, I became more and more impressed with President Kennedy and came more to appreciate his role as president . . . .

Collins: I was brought up in my grandfather’s house and I voted in 1960. I was 18 and living in Georgia[1], and I voted for Nixon because my grandfather voted for Nixon and he had not voted for a Republican in his entire life and he said the Kennedys didn’t have brains in their head.  I didn’t know what he meant but I kind of got it later. He didn’t like him because he was Catholic.  The other thing about Kennedy was that the South did not like him and he sounded very liberal for the time.  He was not as it turned out, . . . .

Brown: He was young and attractive and articulate and bright and surrounded himself with bright people.  He got a lot of us involved in politics.

Nunnelly: I don’t recall that I had strong views either way.  He was the president and the president is revered in most cases, . . . .  I remember that I may have been surprised when he won in 1960.  [He was] very popular, you know, young, vibrant, . . . which was a bit of a contrast to the presidents that had been before him.

Adapted from Oral History Interviews by Holly Howell, Sara Curley, Ben Woodall, Haley Rester, Smith Ann Burley, Katie Dover, and Robert McNeill.


[1] Georgia lowered their voting age from 21 to 18 in 1943.